Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Definitions of five dimensions of SERVPERF.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Membership functions of triangular interval-valued fuzzy number.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

IVFNs of linguistic variables for rating of alternatives.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

IVFNs of linguistic variables for importance weights of criteria.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Overall framework.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

Evaluation criteria of five dimensions and sub-criteria of SERVPERF.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Linguistic variables for rating of alternatives.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

IFVNs of aggregated decision matrix for rating of alternatives.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Defuzzified decision matrix for rating of alternatives.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Comparability sequence for each criterion.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Subjective weights based on the averaging score method.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Objective weights based on entropy measure.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Integrated weights of criteria.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

Overall grey relational coefficients.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Table 13.

Overall grey relational grades and ranking.

More »

Table 13 Expand

Fig 3.

Results of sensitivity analysis.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 14.

Comparison with other MCDM methods in current studies.

More »

Table 14 Expand