Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The dose distributions for the (a) IMRT and (b) VMAT plans.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Description of modifications for treatment plan.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Schematic diagram of EPID-based 3D in vivo dose reconstruction.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Gamma consistency comparison between EPID reconstruction and TPS simulation.

(a) and (b) 2%/2 mm gamma results for Body and PTV structures, respectively. (c) and (d) 3%/3 mm gamma results for Body and PTV structures, respectively. The results were the average of the IMRT and VMAT plan results in both nonuniform and uniform simple phantoms.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Gamma comparisons of EPID reconstruction dose between IMRT and VMAT treatment techniques.

(a) and (b) 2%/2 mm gamma results for Body and PTV structures, respectively. The dotted line represents a failure rate of 10% for the 2%/2 mm criteria. The results were the average of nonuniform and uniform phantoms.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Gamma comparisons of EPID reconstruction dose between nonuniform and uniform simple phantoms.

(a) and (b) for 2%/2 mm gamma results for Body and PTV structures, respectively. The gamma results are the average of the results of the IMRT and VMAT plans.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

PTV DVH consistency comparison between EPID reconstruction and TPS simulation for MLC shift.

TPS simulation (left). EPID reconstruction (right).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

PTV DVH consistency comparison between EPID reconstruction and TPS simulation for Phantom shift, (a) TPS simulation. (b) EPID reconstruction.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 2.

Relative dose differences of D95, D50 and D5 between the Phantom shift plans and the original plans.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 8.

PTV DVH consistency comparison between EPID reconstruction and TPS simulation for PTV deformation.

TPS simulation (left). EPID reconstruction (right).

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

DVH consistency comparison of EPID reconstruction and CBCT-guided EPID reconstruction with TPS simulation for phantom left shift.

(a) TPS simulation. (b) CBCT-guided EPID reconstruction. (c) EPID reconstruction.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 3.

Gamma failure rate statistics of pure EPID reconstruction, CBCT-guided EPID reconstruction and TPS simulation for thoracic Phantom shift.

More »

Table 3 Expand