Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Example of a fact box which provides women with information on the benefits and harms of having/not having RRM.

Note that although the information on the benefits was varied across scenarios, the information on harms remained constant.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Response patterns to the scenarios stratified by factors.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Mastectomy considerations according to baseline mortality risks.

The risk of dying from breast cancer and the level of risk reduction were varied across the scenarios. Error bars show the standard error of the mean.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Average mastectomy consideration stratified by factors.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

European mastectomy considerations according to baseline mortality risks.

Proportion of women considering RRM by country and baseline risk of breast cancer-specific mortality. Error bars show the standard error of the mean.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Mastectomy considerations according to country and general desire to know one's cancer risks.

Proportion of women considering RRM by country and the amount of cancer risk information desired. Error bars show the standard error of the mean.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Country-specific linear regressions of average consideration of RRM.

More »

Table 3 Expand