Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Schematic illustration of the experimental procedure and the stimuli examples.

Each trial presented a single stimulus. In a session, a standard stimulus (neutral face) was presented in 70% of the trials, while stimuli (happy or anger faces of diverse intensities) in each deviant condition were presented in 10% of the trials.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Averaged ERPs for high self-esteem (left) and low self-esteem (right) participants during the 100%, 70%, and 40% face conditions in the negative session.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Averaged ERPs for high self-esteem (left) and low self-esteem (right) participants during the 100%, 70%, and 40% face conditions in the positive session.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics for response times and standard deviation for each condition in the positive and negative sessions.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

(Top) Topographical maps of the amplitudes difference between 100% and 70% happy faces (across 300–500 ms) in high and low self-esteem participants. (Bottom) Topographical maps of the amplitudes difference between 100% and 40% anger faces (across 300–500 ms), and between 70% and 40% anger faces (across 300–500 ms) in high and low self-esteem participants.

More »

Fig 4 Expand