Table 1.
Application of MCDM methods for the different problem.
Fig 1.
Membership functions of linguistic variables for measuring rating of alternatives.
Table 2.
The TFNs of linguistic variables for rating of alternatives.
Fig 2.
Membership functions of linguistic variables for the importance weight of criteria.
Table 3.
The TFNs of linguistic variables for the importance weight of criteria.
Fig 3.
Overall research framework.
Table 4.
Criteria for mobile service evaluation within navigation category.
Table 5.
Initial direct-influence fuzzy matrix as assessed by decision makers.
Table 6.
Aggregated initial direct-influence defuzzified matrix.
Table 7.
Total-influence matrix and subjective weights.
Fig 4.
Influence relation map (IRM).
Table 8.
Linguistic variables for rating of alternatives assessed by decision makers.
Table 9.
Objective weights based on entropy measure.
Table 10.
Integrated weights of criteria.
Table 11.
Aggregated defuzzified ratings of alternatives.
Table 12.
Positive ideal solutions and negative ideal solutions
.
Table 13.
Scores of .
Table 14.
Q values and ranking.
Fig 5.
Sensitivity analysis of coefficient for integrated weight.
Fig 6.
Sensitivity analysis for influence levels of the v value in VIKOR method.
Table 15.
Comparison with other methods.