Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Results of ICE analysis.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

GO annotation of P. thomsonii transcripts.

Percent of transcripts assigned to partial subcategories of the cellular component (blue), molecular function (red) and biological process (green) categories are shown.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

KEGG enrichment of DETs for the comparison of roots vs leaves.

The X-axis represents the enrichment factor and log10 of the Q-value. The Y-axis indicates the different KEGG pathways.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Expression profiles of 8 transcripts by qRT-PCR and the correlation of the results between qRT-PCR and RNA-Seq.

Fold changes in the transcript levels of different tissues are shown in Fig 3A. The average expression levels in the plant leaves were set to 1. Error bars represent standard error. L, S and R represent the leaves, stems and roots, respectively. Fig 3B shows the correlation between the qRT-PCR and RNA-Seq expression levels. The X-axis represents log2-fold change in the expression levels found by qRT-PCR. The Y-axis indicates the log2 value of the expression level fold change from RNA-Seq.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Identification of 32 P. thomsonii miRNAs.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Predicted hairpin structures of P. thomsonii miRNA precursors.

Mature miRNA sequences are indicated in red. The red, green and blue vertical lines indicate G:C, G:U and A:U pairing, respectively.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

MIR398c and MIR2119b cluster at a single transcript.

More »

Fig 5 Expand