Fig 1.
R2 values from the multiple linear regression between footfall kinematics and XCoM in the iterative step specific analysis for each experimental condition.
Fig 2.
Effect of the walking conditions on the three main outcome parameters: CV-SW, CV-ST and LyE.
Mean (SD) in the table are in units of the outcome, for CV-SW and CV-ST in %, for LyE the exponent value. Bold p-values indicate significance at 5% alpha level in the LSD post-hoc test.
Fig 3.
Overview of all SEM models with total variance explained (bold) and standardised correlation coefficients.
Table 1.
Comparison of SEM models, with tests for multivariate normgality, distinct and estimated degrees of freedom, total variance explained, Chi-square statistic, Root-mean square error, Chi-square goodness of fit and Akaike information criterion.