Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Distribution map of county-level administrative toponyms with the time of being named from 1,000 years ago.

The dots represent data on county-level administrative toponyms with naming time from 1,000 years ago. The green dots represent county-level administrative toponyms being named for 1,000–1,499 years, blue dots those being named for 1,500–1,999 years, and red dots those being named for 2,000 years ago.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Map of the case study areas.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Generation and transmission mode of Geo-Informatic Tupu.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Spatio-temporal evolution of county-level administrative toponyms in the Northeast China Plain since the Sui dynasty.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Spatio-temporal evolution of county-level administrative toponyms in the North China Plain since the Sui dynasty.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Spatio-temporal evolution of county-level administrative toponyms in the Yangtze Plain since the Sui dynasty.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 1.

Statistical characteristics of county-level administrative toponyms.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 7.

Distribution characteristics of naming time of county-level administrative toponyms in 2010.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 2.

Distribution characteristics of naming types of county-level administrative toponyms in 2010.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Statistical characteristics of county-level administrative toponyms relevant to natural factors since the Sui dynasty.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 8.

DEM data of the case study areas.

DEM data at a resolution of 30 m were provided by the RESDC.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Spatial distribution of toponym density and county GDP of the Northeast China Plain.

The statistical data on China’s GDP in 2010 (Figs 8, 10, 12) were obtained from the RESDC.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Spatial distribution of toponym density and county population density in the Northeast China Plain.

Population data at the county level (Figs 9, 11, 13) were obtained from the 6th Census of China (2010).

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Spatial distribution of toponym density and county GDP of the North China Plain.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Spatial distribution of toponym density and county population density in the North China Plain.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Spatial distribution of toponym density and county GDP of the Yangtze Plain.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Spatial distribution of toponym density and county population density in the Yangtze Plain.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Table 4.

Correlation coefficients between county-level administrative toponym density and DEM, GDP, and population density.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Correlation coefficients between administrative toponym density and DEM, GDP, and population density.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 15.

Trend chart of toponym, population, and temperature changes.

The temperature values in Fig 15 are the change values with the current temperature. For historical population data, we referred to the statistical data from the National Earth System Science Data Sharing Infrastructure, National Science & Technology Infrastructure of China, and made some adjustments.

More »

Fig 15 Expand