Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Experimental study design.

White areas represent the time periods when energy expenditure was not registered; grey areas included the time periods when the energy expenditure measurement was performed but discarded; black areas represent the time periods when energy expenditure measurement was performed and selected for further analysis.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Descriptive parameters.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Energy expenditure (EE; panel A), respiratory quotient (RQ; panel B), minute ventilation (VE; panel C), and respiratory rate (RR; panel D) in lying, sitting, and standing positions.

Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. P value derived of repeated measures analysis of variance followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test. Parallel lines mean P<0.001.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Heart rate (HR) in lying, sitting, and standing positions.

Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. P value derived of repeated measures analysis of variance. Parallel lines mean P<0.001.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Associations between the change on energy expenditure (EE) of changing from one position another: Lying vs. sitting, lying vs. standing, and sitting vs. standing with body weight (Panels A, B, and C), height (Panels, D, E, and F), lean body mass (Panels G, H and I), and fat body mass (Panels J, K and L).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

R individual energy expenditure (EE; Panels A, C, and E) and respiratory quotient (RQ; Panels B, D, and F) responses of lying vs. sitting position (Panels A and B), lying vs. standing position (Panels C and D) and sitting vs. standing position (Panels E and F) comparing spenders vs. savers.

Spenders were defined as participants who showed a rise in EE >5% between two positions and savers are those who showed little or no change in EE (a rise in EE of <5% between two positions). Δ EE was calculated as the change in EE during the second 5 minutes corresponding to the two positions compared, and it is expressed as a percentage of the first position indicated for each comparison. Δ RQ was calculated as the change in RQ during the second 5 minutes corresponding to the two positions compared, and it is expressed as means ± standard deviation.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 2.

Demographic characteristics in savers and spenders.

More »

Table 2 Expand