Fig 1.
Line drawings of Ektaphelenchus kanzakii n. sp.
A&B: Female and male entire body, C&D: Anterior end and corresponding details, E: Pharynx, F: Male posterior body region, G: Stylet structure (cop.: conophore), H&I: Female posterior body end, J: Spicules, K: Epiptygma-like small differentiation (arrowhead).
Fig 2.
Light microphotographs of Ektaphelenchus kanzakii n. sp.
A: Part of female reproductive system (epiptygma-like differentiation in vulva is visible; arrowhead), B: Part of pharynx (inset: Stylet in detail, ca. 20 μm long), C&D: Anterior end, E: Conus and middle part of stylet in high contrast, F&J: Female posterior body end, G&K: Male posterior body end, H: Lateral lines, I: Spicules. (All scale bars = 10 μm, except the inset in plate B, its conus 7 μm).
Table 1.
Morphometrics of Ektaphelenchus kanzakii n. sp. and Iranian population of Devibursaphelenchus teratospicularis Kakulia & Devdariani, 1965.
All measurements are in μm and in the form mean±S.D. (range).
Fig 3.
Iranian population of Devibursaphelenchus teratospicularis Kakulia & Devdariani, 1965 [13].
A-C: Anterior region of body (B: Stylet in higher magnitude), D: Vulva region and postvulval uterine sac (PUS), E: Female posterior body end, F&G: Male posterior body end, H: Spicules, I: Bursa in lateral view. (All scale bars = 10 μm).
Fig 4.
Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree inferred from SSU rDNA of Ektaphelenchus kanzakii n. sp. and Iranian population of Devibursaphelenchus teratospicularis Kakulia & Devdariani, 1965 [13] under the GTR + G + I model.
Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) more than 50% are given for appropriate clades. New sequences are in bold font.
Fig 5.
Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree inferred from LSU rDNA D2-D3 of Ektaphelenchus kanzakii n. sp. and Iranian population of Devibursaphelenchus teratospicularis Kakulia & Devdariani, 1965 [13] under the GTR + G + I model.
Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) more than 50% are given for appropriate clades. New sequences are in bold font.