Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Selection of studies for inclusion in the systematic review.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Study characteristics of the included randomized controlled trials.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Study characteristics of the included prospective cohort studies.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Risk of bias summary: Review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

GRADE evidence profile: Intervention vs no intervention/control.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Summary of findings.

Intervention vs No Intervention.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Summary of findings.

Intervention vs Control.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Summary of findings.

Computer-based vs Instructor-based.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 3.

Analysis 1.1.1 forest plot of comparison: Intervention vs no intervention, up to 4 months–primary school children, outcome: Home fire safety knowledge, 2 RCTs. Analysis 1.1.2 Forest plot of comparison: Intervention vs No Intervention, up to 4 months–Primary School Children, outcome: Home Fire Safety Behaviour, 2 RCTs.

Higher values indicate better/improved outcome.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Analysis 4.1.1 forest plot of comparison: Intervention vs no intervention, immediate–primary school children, outcome: Home fire safety knowledge, 1 study.

Analysis 4.1.2 Forest plot of comparison: Intervention vs No Intervention, 3 months–Primary School Children, outcome: Home Fire Safety Knowledge, 1 study. Higher values indicate better/improved outcome.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Analysis 2.1.1 forest plot of comparison: Intervention vs control, 2 months–families with children, outcome: Home fire safety knowledge, 1 rct.

Analysis 2.1.2 Forest plot of comparison: Intervention vs Control, 6 months–Families with Children, outcome: Home Fire Safety Behaviour, 1 RCT. Analysis 2.1.3 Forest plot of comparison: Intervention vs Control, 12 months–Families with Children, outcome: Home Fire Safety Behaviour, 1 RCT. Higher values indicate better/improved outcome.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Analysis 3.1.1 Forest plot of comparison: Computer-based vs instructor-led, immediate–adults, outcome: Home fire safety knowledge, 1 RCT.

Analysis 3.1.2 Forest plot of comparison: Computer-based vs Instructor-led, Immediate–Adults, outcome: Home Fire Safety Behaviour, 1 RCT. Higher values indicate better/improved outcome.

More »

Fig 6 Expand