Fig 1.
Location of the Campana Peñuelas biosphere reserve.
Table 1.
Stakeholders involved in the study and some of their characteristics.
Table 2.
Ecosystem services identified from an extensive literature review.
Table 3.
Value typology used to classify the justifications of importance of the ecosystem services given by respondents.
Modified from Rolston and Coufal [61].
Table 4.
Ranking of ecosystem services according to importance score, mean vulnerability value and importance-vulnerability index.
The order of ecosystem services in the first column follows the importance-vulnerability index value from highest to lowest.
Fig 2.
Graphical representation of the 11 services selected for analysis and their importance and vulnerability scores.
Fig 3.
(A, B). RDA Biplot. To better visualize the results, the graphic was divided into two separate figures. Both were created with the results of the same analysis using all variables.
Fig 4.
Dendrogram from the hierarchical cluster analysis.
Table 5.
Arguments supplied by respondents to explain why the ecosystem services were important to them, classified according to the value dimensions derived by Rolston and Coufal [61].