Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) growth detection using the TB-CX test.

Positive for M.tb growth (red micro-colonies) on clear quadrant (a) and Negative for M.tb growth on clear quadrant (b).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Diagnostic accuracy of the tuberculosis culture (TB-CX) test, Xpert MTB/RIF test compared to the Lӧwenstein Jensen (LJ) culture method.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of drug susceptibility test results for sputum samples from tuberculosis patients as determined by the tuberculosis culture (TB-CX) and Lӧwenstein Jensen (LJ) indirect proportional DST (n = 70).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Performance characteristics of the tuberculosis culture (TB-CX) test compared to the Lӧwenstein Jensen (LJ) indirect proportional drug susceptibility test (DST) for detection of drug-tesistant M. tuberculosis (M.tb) isolates (n = 70).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison the LJ indirect proportional method (n = 72), the tuberculosis culture (TB-CX) test (n = 70) with Xpert MTB/RIF assay for detection of rifampin drug resistance.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

Drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) detection using the TB-CX test.

RIF resistant, M.tb red colony growth on clear and yellow quadrants (a); MDR-M.tb, M.tb red colony growth on clear, green, and yellow quadrants (b); MDR-M.tb + PZA resistant, M.tb red colony growth on clear, green, yellow, and blue quadrants (c).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 5.

Frequency table of tuberculosis culture (TB-CX) Test Turnaround Time (TAT).

More »

Table 5 Expand