Table 1.
Summary of studies.
Fig 1.
Samples 1b, 2, and 3, example age-group comparison item, with 0 = Not at All and 100 = Completely.
Fig 2.
Emoji scale item used in samples 1a, 2, and 3 for affective responses to being called “narcissistic” or “entitled”.
Each emoji corresponds to a numerical value, ranging from 1 (large frown) to 5 (large smile).
Table 2.
Descriptive Statistics for Included Variables.
Table 3.
Samples 1a, 2, and 3†: Correlations and 95% CIs between traits and opinions-of/reactions-to traits.
Table 4.
Study 1, sample 3, Bonferroni-corrected post hoc comparisons by participant age category.
Table 5.
Study 1, sample 1a, repeated measures ANCOVA comparing age-group descriptors.
Table 6.
Study 1, sample 2, repeated measures ANCOVA comparing age-group descriptors.
Fig 3.
Sample 1a, means and 95% confidence intervals of emerging adult ratings of age-group traits.
Data points represent age category being rated.
Fig 4.
Sample 2, means and 95% confidence intervals of emerging adult ratings of age-group traits.
Data points represent age category being rated.
Fig 5.
Sample 3, means and 95% confidence intervals of age-group traits by age category of participants.
Data points represent group being rated; paneled rows represent participant age.
Table 7.
Study 1, sample 3, repeated measures ANCOVA comparing age-group descriptors.
Table 8.
Study 1, samples 1c, 2, & 3, correlations and 95% CIs between traits and reactions to Stein excerpt.
Table 9.
Study 3, independent T-Test comparisons of reactions to narcissism described as good or bad.
Table 10.
Study 3, regressions predicting responses to narcissism described as good or bad.