Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Location of the three study sites in Ghana.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Key characteristics of the study sites.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Study groups and sample sizes.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Multidimensional poverty dimensions, indicators, weights and deprivation cut-offs.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Weighting variation for restricted dominance analysis.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Basic household characteristics for each study group.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Statistical difference of means for basic household characteristics.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 2.

Group distribution across income quartiles.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 7.

Mean annual income, consumption and incidence of poverty for each study group.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Statistical difference between groups for income and consumption.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis of the impact of involvement in industrial crops on household income and consumption.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 3.

Multi-dimensional poverty index for each study group.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 10.

Multi-dimensional poverty index and confidence intervals for each study groups.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Multi-dimensional poverty index based on indicator weight variation.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

Deprivation against individual indicators for each study group.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Fig 4.

Mean subjective wellbeing indicator scores for each study group.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 13.

Distribution of responses for each subjective wellbeing indicator (in %).

More »

Table 13 Expand

Table 14.

Comparison of the levels of subjective wellbeing between study groups.

More »

Table 14 Expand