Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Kanazawa Medical University Cataract Classification and Grading System.

a: Retrodots—Judged by size of area of opacity within the central 3-mm diameter area of the pupil, b: Waterclefts—Central type WC: opacity inside but not outside the central 3-mm diameter area of the pupil, Peripheral type WC: opacity outside but not inside this central 3-mm diameter area.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Cortical cataract opacity cases.

a: axle-shaped opacity, b: wedge-shaped opacity, c: ring-shaped opacity. Inner circle (yellow) shows the central 6-mm diameter area of the pupil.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Number and mean age of the subjects in each region.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Prevalence of the five types of cataract per region.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

COUV distribution among subjects.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Mean cumulative ocular UV exposure by region (stratified by sex and age).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Risk of the five types of cataract in the high cumulative ocular UV exposure (COUV) group compared with the low COUV group (adjusted for age, sex, axial length, and DM).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Risk of the five types of cataract for two-, three- and four-fold cumulative ocular UV exposure (COUV) based on the mean COUV in Japanese people (all adjusted for age, sex, axial length, and DM).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

COR (axle-shaped, wedge-shaped, and ring-shaped) risk of the high cumulative ocular UV exposure (COUV) group compared with the low COUV group (all adjusted for age, sex, axial length, and DM).

More »

Table 6 Expand