Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Sampling times and tank distribution for each group.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Parameters of the MS/MS detector.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Monitored ion masses.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Adjustment, type of distribution and parameters of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

LD50 bacterial counts of inoculum dilutions.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Distribution of isolates by year, host species and geographical area.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 1.

Distribution of the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration values of 87 strains of Piscirickettsia salmonis versus florfenicol.

Distributions obtained through the ECOFFinder (a) and NRI (b) programs. Bars represent the gross count of the number of isolates in each concentration of antimicrobial; lines represent the curves of best fit for the distribution of WT strains.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 7.

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and epidemiological cut-off points (COWT) for the total strains of P. salmonis analyzed against Florfenicol.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 2.

Average plasma concentrations (μg/mL) by sampling time (hours) and dose: 10, 15 and 20 mg/Kg.

Different letters represent statistical differences between groups (p<0.05).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 8.

Average pharmacokinetics of florfenicol parameters by the trial dose.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

PK/PD index (AUC0-24h/ MIC) for doses 10, 15 and 20 mg/ Kg.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Statistical parameters and probability of reaching a target reference point greater than 125 (TRP>125) AUC20 mg/MICn.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Integration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variables (PK/PD) using the Montecarlo simulation.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Fig 3.

Cumulative mortality (%) in Atlantic salmon after P. salmonis challenge in dilutions of 1/10, 1/100, 1/1000 and 1/10000. TK: Tank.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 12.

RT-PCR SRS results at days 3 and 6 post challenge with P. salmonis.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Fig 4.

Specific Feed Rate (%) by date of experiment.

Challenge group: Tanks 2 and 3; Control (+) (without medication): Tanks 5 and 6; Control (-) (without challenge): Tank 9. TK: Tank; SFR: Specific Feed Rate. For more information, see S4 Table.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Cumulative mortality (%) by date of experiment.

Challenge group: Tanks 2 and 3; Control (+) (without medication): Tanks 5 and 6; Control (-) (without challenge): Tank 9. For more information, see S5S7 Tables.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 13.

RT-PCR SRS results from necropsy of mortality of Atlantic salmon challenge with P. salmonis during the experiment.

More »

Table 13 Expand

Table 14.

RT-PCR SRS results from necropsy of euthanized fish (Atlantic salmon) after the experiment.

More »

Table 14 Expand