Fig 1.
Diagram of proposed real-time risk assessment method for building emergency evacuation.
Fig 2.
Coverage of surveillance cameras SC#1 and SC#2.
Fig 3.
(a) Simulated evacuation scenario in an office building. Evacuation for (b) N = 40, MD = 14.00; (c) N = 80, MD = 14.00; (d) N = 80, MD = 15.25. (MD: mean distance to the exit).
Fig 4.
Sensitivity according to (a) number of evacuees and (b) evacuee positions.
Fig 5.
Structure of a library used to evaluate the proposed method: (a) first, (b) second, and (c) third floors.
Fig 6.
Evacuation process at the (a) first, (b) second, and (c) third floors.
Fig 7.
Varying of evacuation rate in the real scenario of (a) first, (b) second, and (c) third floors as well as (d) whole building.
Fig 8.
Convergence process of (a) Adam, (b) Adagrad (c) Adamax (d) RMSprop and (e) sgd.
Table 1.
Accuracy of different methods.
Fig 9.
Error of evaluated number of escape.