Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Taxonomical hierarchy of host plants: (a) A. elaeagnoidea, (b) F. inermis and (c) P. serratifolia.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Map showing the geographical location of the sampling site.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Colonization frequency (CF) and endophytic infection rate (EIR) of foliar endophytic fungi from three Magnoliopsida plants.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Sampling effort and number of foliar endophytic fungi isolated from A. elaeagnoidea, F. inermis, and P. serratifolia.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Taxonomical hierarchy of foliar endophytic fungi isolated from A. elaeagnoidea, F. inermis and P. serratifolia.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Box and whiskers plots depicting the secondary structral free energy, GC content and length of the ITS2 sequences employed in this study.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Consensus secondary structure of all internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) sequences employed in molecular morphometric analysis. Helices were numbered I–III from 5’ to 3’ direction.

Sequence conservation was indicated with colours from red (not conserved) to green (>51%; conserved).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Internal transcribed spacer 2 sequence–secondary structure based phylogenetic tree of Botryosphaeriales and Dothideales query and reference sequences.

The query sequences are represented by the symbol “♦”. Bootstrap (BP) values ≥50 were represented in the tree. Maximum Likelihood tree was presented with branch support values as BP of ML tree / BP of NJ tree.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Internal transcribed spacer 2 sequence–secondary structure based phylogenetic tree of Diaporthales query and reference sequences.

The query sequences are represented by the symbol “♦”. Bootstrap (BP) values ≥50 were represented in the tree. Maximum Likelihood tree was presented with branch support values as BP of ML tree / BP of NJ tree.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Internal transcribed spacer 2 sequence–secondary structure based phylogenetic tree of Glomerellales and Xylariales query and reference sequences.

The query sequences are represented by the symbol “♦”. Bootstrap (BP) values ≥50 were represented in the tree. Maximum Likelihood tree was presented with branch support values as BP of ML tree / BP of NJ tree.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Internal transcribed spacer 2 sequence–secondary structure based phylogenetic tree of Pleosporales query and reference sequences.

The query sequences are represented by the symbol “♦”. Bootstrap (BP) values ≥50 were represented in the tree. Maximum Likelihood tree was presented with branch support values as BP of ML tree / BP of NJ tree.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Relative percentage occurrence of different foliar endophytic fungal taxa isolated from (A) A. elaeagniodea, (B) F. inermis and (C) P. serratifolia and (D) Illustration of the host specificity.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Species accumulation curves of foliar endophytic fungi recovered from Magnoliopsida plants.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 2.

Species richness (ACE and Chao 1), evenness (Simpson Inverse and Alpha) and Shannon’s diversity (H’) indices of A. elaeagniodea, F. inermis, and P. serratifolia.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Shared species indices of A. elaeagniodea, F. inermis and P. serratifolia.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 13.

Ranked species graphs of foliar endophytic fungal assemblages in (A) A. elaeagniodea, (B) F. inermis and (C) P. serratifolia.

More »

Fig 13 Expand