Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Name of the test, test developer and used antigens of the 7 compared assays.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Frequency of combinations of test results in known infected and non-infected populations.

Combinations of test results with zero counts are not listed in the table.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) of 142 culture or PCR positive proven samples, 112 positives samples from animals with clinical signs of glanders and of all 254 samples together, and diagnostic specificity (DSe) of 2,959 tested samples including the respective 95% CI.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Posterior median and 95% probability intervals for sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of the CFT, Hcp1, IDVet and WB tests for glanders in equids.

Median is preferred to mean given the asymmetric distribution.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Likelihood ratios for CFT, WB, IDVet, Hcp1 and predictive values in scenarios of 0.1% and 3% disease prevalence.

More »

Table 5 Expand