Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Molecular structure of arylamino-s-triazines (based on Dankwardt et al., 1996).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Cross-reactivity (CR) and concentration of 50% inhibition for the interaction of triazines with polyclonal (S2) and monoclonal antibodies (K4E7), according to Dankwardt et al., 1996.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The most energetically favorable conformations of compounds 5, 11 and 12 according to the calculation by HF/6-31G(d) method.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Triazine geometries optimized with the AM1 method (hydrogen atoms are represented only in -OH groups).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Statistical parameters of the models for the S2 system.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Comparison of experimental pIC50 values for triazine interactions with polyclonal antibodies (S2) and predicted activity based on Model 5; compounds 4, 6, 14 and 19 were used as a test set.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Statistical parameters of 2D QSAR models for the K4E7 system.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

Comparison of experimental pIC50 values for triazine interactions with monoclonal antibodies (K4E7) and predicted activity based on Model 10; compounds 6, 10, 16 and 20 were used as a test set.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 4.

Experimental and predicted values of the triazine cross-reactivity logarithm (pIC50) in the S2 system.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Statistical parameters of the CoMFA model for the S2 system.

SDEP: mean-square error of prediction. LOO: leave-one-out.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Experimental vs. predicted values of triazine cross-reactivity in the S2 system according to the CoMFA method (3D QSAR).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

The molecular interaction field (MIF) contour maps for system S2 and compound 7: (a) favorable steric interactions; (b) unfavorable steric interactions; (c) sites favorable for positively charged groups; (d) sites favorable for negatively charged groups.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

K4E7 system’s experimental and predicted pIC50 triazine values based on the CoMFA method (3D QSAR).

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 6.

Experimental and predicted values of triazine cross-reactivity in the K4E7 system.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 9.

MIF contour maps for the K4E7 system: (a) favorable steric interactions and (b) unfavorable steric interactions for compound 11; (c) sites favorable for positively charged groups; (d) sites favorable for negatively charged groups for compound 12.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 7.

Statistical parameters of the 3D QSAR model for the K4E7 system.

More »

Table 7 Expand