Table 1.
Recipient characteristics.
Table 2.
Donor characteristics.
Table 3.
Perioperative outcomes.
Table 4.
AUROC analysis and goodness-of-fit testing for the various scores based on 90-day mortality and major complications (CD≥3b).
Table 5.
Specificity, sensitivity, and Youden indices to determine the best cutoff points for the BAR, pSOFT, SOFT, DRI, and ET-DRI scores based on 90-day mortality.
Table 6.
Stratification of the postoperative outcome based on the determined BAR, pSOFT, SOFT, DRI and ET-DRI cutoffs.
Table 7.
Association between the BAR, pSOFT, SOFT, DRI and ET-DRI scores and perioperative outcome parameters as well as pre-transplant labMELD.
Fig 1.
Patient- and graft survival stratified by the determined BAR-, pSOFT-, SOFT-, DRI- and ET-DRI-cutoff values.
(A) Five-year patient survival according to the used score models. (B) Five-year graft survival according to the used score models. BAR, Balance of Risk; pSOFT, preallocation Survival Outcomes Following Liver Transplant; SOFT, Survival Outcomes Following Liver Transplant; DRI, Donor Risk Index; ET-DRI, Eurotransplant-Donor Risk Index.