Table 1.
Preference overview.
Table 2.
Simulation input parameters for comparing algorithm performance.
Fig 1.
Absolute number of matched participants.
Fig 2.
Relative number of matched participants compared to optimal solution.
Fig 3.
Average welfare scores for participants.
Fig 4.
Average fairness score of solutions.
Table 3.
Simulation input parameters for the manipulation study.
Fig 5.
Change in matched rank for manipulating participants based on degree of manipulation.
Fig 6.
Relative change in matched rank for manipulating participants based on degree of manipulation.
Fig 7.
Change in matched rank for manipulating participants based on percentage of manipulating participants.
Fig 8.
Relative change in matched rank for manipulating participants based on percentage of manipulating participants.
Fig 9.
Probability of successful manipulation based on degree of manipulation.
Fig 10.
Probability of successful manipulation based on percentage of manipulating participants.
Fig 11.
Change in matched rank for non-manipulating participants based on degree of manipulation.
Fig 12.
Relative change in matched rank for non-manipulating participants based on degree of manipulation.
Fig 13.
Change in matched rank for non-manipulating participants based on percentage of manipulating participants.
Fig 14.
Relative change in matched rank for non-manipulating participants based on percentage of manipulating participants.
Fig 15.
Number of unstable pairs based on degree of manipulation.
Fig 16.
Number of unstable pairs based on percentage of manipulating participants.