Table 1.
Three factors for coping and subscales in each coping style.
Table 2.
Study 1 participants’ means and standard deviations on the measure of SES, empathy, and coping strategies.
Table 3.
Hierarchical regression models predicting coping strategies in Study 1.
Fig 1.
Relationship between empathy and adaptive coping in Study 1.
(A) Simple slope result for +/- 1SD SES individuals on adaptive coping. (B) Estimated coefficient of empathy on adaptive coping for different SES individuals.
Fig 2.
Relationship between empathy and social support in Study 1.
(A) Simple slope result for +/- 1SD SES individuals on social support. (B) Estimated coefficient of empathy on social support for different SES individuals.
Fig 3.
Relationship between empathy and maladaptive coping in Study 1.
(A) Simple slope result for +/- 1SD SES individuals on maladaptive coping. (B) Estimated coefficient of empathy on maladaptive coping for different SES individuals.
Fig 4.
Relationship between empathy and adaptive coping in Study 2.
(A) Simple slope result for +/- 1SD SES individuals on adaptive coping. (B) Estimated coefficient of empathy on adaptive coping for different SES individuals.
Table 4.
Results summary from Studies 1–4.
Table 5.
Study 5 participants’ means and standard deviations on the measure of SES, empathy, and coping strategies.
Fig 5.
Participants’ usage of coping strategies across different genotypes in Study 5 (with SD).
Table 6.
Hierarchical regression results for adaptive coping (with AA genotype as reference).
Fig 6.
Interaction between genotype and SES on adaptive coping in Study 5.
(A) Line plot. (B) Bar plot with standard deviation.
Table 7.
Hierarchical regression results for maladaptive coping.
Fig 7.
Interaction between genotype and SES on maladaptive coping in Study 5.
(A) Line plot. (B) Bar plot with standard deviation.
Table 8.
Results summary from Study 5.