Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Screw conveyor in the EPB shield machine (from http://cn.herrenknecht.com/cn).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Schematic view of the screw conveyor structure.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The definition of the helical angle.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The studied object.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The size of the soil microbody.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The forces acted on the soil microbody.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

The movement of the soil microbody.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

The velocity vector between the soil microbody and the blade.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Screw conveyor model machine.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 1.

Parameters of the model screw conveyor.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Geotechnical indices of standard sand.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 10.

The slump tests of composite additive conditioning soil.

(A) Only 15% bentonite slurry. (B) 15% bentonite slurry with 10% foam solution. (C) 15% bentonite slurry with 20% foam solution. (D) 15% bentonite slurry with 30% foam solution. (E) 15% bentonite slurry with 40% foam solution. (F) 15% bentonite slurry with 50% foam solution.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Slumps under different additive injection ratios.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Driving torque schedule.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Shear stress of testing point 1.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Shear stress of testing point 2.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Shear stress of testing point 3.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Shear stress of testing point 4.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Shear stress of testing point 5.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

Shear stress of testing point 6.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Fig 19.

Fitting residuals at each measuring point.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Fig 20.

Comparison of the mean theoretical value and linear fitting value.

More »

Fig 20 Expand