Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Evolution of literature on ELS formulations and components considered in the mentioned reference.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Elements of the ELS model.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Characteristics of the computer used in the simulations.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Distributions and true parameters used in the simulation study.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Inventory model parameters for t = 1, 2, 3 periods of the decision stages.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Empirical mean, SD, CS, CK, median, and Friedman p-value of the for the indicated distribution, link, σ and percentile.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Evaluation of out-of-sample scenarios for the indicated distribution, link, σ and percentile with simulated data and the mentioned performance indicator.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Data set of monthly DPUTs of two pharmaceutical products.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 1.

Histogram (A), box plots (B) and index-plot (C) of monthly DPUT; scatter-plot between DPUT and DPUT of the correlated pharmaceutical product (D); ACF (E) and PACF (F) plots of DPUT.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 9.

Descriptive statistics of monthly DPUT for the pharmaceutical product.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Criterion and deviance for different GARMA models with DPUT data of the pharmaceutical product.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Fig 2.

PP plot with 95% acceptance bands (A) and index-plot of the quantile residual (B) with DPUT data.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 11.

Effect of scenarios of DPUT percentiles using the indicated model on SP elements in two stages with DPUT data of the pharmaceutical product.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

Evaluation of out-of-sample scenarios for the case study according to the mentioned performance indicator.

More »

Table 12 Expand