Fig 1.
The process of resolving a MAGDM/ FMAGDM problem.
Fig 2.
The conceptual framework of the proposed method.
Table 1.
Comparisons between our approach and the two related approaches.
Fig 3.
Hierarchical structure of the proposed method.
Table 2.
Three score attribute matrices.
Table 3.
Three weighted (on attributes) scores matrices.
Table 4.
The weights of the DMs in different situations.
Table 5.
Three individual weighted (on attributes and DMs) decision matrices.
Table 6.
A comparison of the orders of the alternatives of Example 1 for different parameters.
Table 7.
A comparison of the orders of the alternatives of Example 1 for different methods.
Table 8.
Three scores matrices of attributes.
Table 9.
Three weighted (on attributes) scores matrices.
Table 10.
The weights of DMs in different situations.
Table 11.
Three individual weighted (on attributes and DMs) decision matrices.
Table 12.
A comparison of the orders of the alternatives of Example 2 for different parameters.
Table 13.
A comparison of the orders of the alternatives of Example 2 for different methods.