Fig 1.
The tripartite life-course model.
Table 1.
Welfare regimes and working age life-courses.
Table 2.
Number, gender, and birth cohort of respondents, by country.
Table 3.
Frequencies of activities by gender, pooled time-series (in percent).
Fig 2.
Dendrogram for the clusters among men.
The model fit is 0.36 Point Biserial Correlation, 0.26 Average Silhouette Width, 1 872 Calinski-Harabasz index using squared distances, 0.51 Hubert’s Somers’ D, and 0.19 Hubert’s C.
Fig 3.
Dendrogram for the clusters among women.
The model fit is 0.79 Point Biserial Correlation, 0.61 Average Silhouette Width, 16 932 Calinski-Harabasz index using squared distances, 0.91 Hubert’s Somers’ D, and 0.05 Hubert’s C.
Fig 4.
Working age life-course clusters among men.
Fig 5.
Working age life-course clusters among women.
Table 4.
Working age life-course clusters by country, gender and cohort (in percent).
Table 5.
Within-country differences in working age life-course clusters, by welfare regime (in percent).
Fig 6.
The life-course models suggested by the data.