Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Basic information about participants of each age-group.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Procedure of endogenous spatial cuing task of Experiment 1.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Each age-group’s mean reaction time and standard deviation (ms).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Results of ANOVA analyses.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Results of ANOVA for each age-group in different cues.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Results of one-sample t test of slope for each age-group in difference cue.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 2.

Each age group’s SNARC effect for valid cues (upper row) and for invalid cues (lower row).

Panels from left to right show 7-, 9-, 11-year-olds, and adults in each row.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 6.

Basic information about participants of each age-group.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 3.

Procedure of the exogenous spatial cuing task of Experiment 2.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 7.

Each age-group’s mean reaction time and standard deviation(ms).

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Results of ANOVA analyses.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Results of interaction about magnitude and hand for each age-group in difference cues.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 4.

Each age group’s SNARC effect for valid cues (upper panels) and invalid cues (lower panels); from left to right, panels show data for 7-, 9-, 11-year-olds, and adults in each row.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 10.

Results of ANOVA for each age-group in difference cues.

More »

Table 10 Expand