Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

LFI tests approved for limited evaluation of performance by WHO.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Flow chart of PCR analysis of samples.

altona assay = RealStar Filovirus Screen RT-PCR kit 1.0; Trombley assay = PHE Zaire-specific RT-PCR Trombley assay.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of altona and Trombley RT- PCR results.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Performance of LFIs compared to altona RT-PCR*.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Sensitivity of LFIs for samples grouped according to altona Ct value (black) and Trombley Ct value (blue).

Bars represent 95% confidence intervals for sensitivity. For the altona assay there were 32, 37, 24, 14 and 19 samples in each RT-PCR Ct group from <20 to ≥29. The corresponding sample sizes for the Trombley assay were 52, 32, 16, 14 and 42.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

Performance of LFIs on plasma samples using Trombley assay as bench mark assay*.

More »

Table 4 Expand