Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Generalized across the subjects relationship between the relative load (%1RM) and mean velocity (upper panel), mean propulsive velocity (middle panel) and peak velocity (lower panel) in the bench pull exercise. The linear (solid line) and second-order polynomial (dashed line) regression equations are depicted. r2, Pearson's coefficient of determination; F, F statistic; N = number of trials included in the regression analysis.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Velocity values associated with each relative load (%1RM) obtained from the individual load-velocity relationships modelled through linear and second-order polynomial regression models.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Within-subject coefficient of variation (CV) with 95% confidence intervals obtained at each relative load for each velocity variable and regression model.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals obtained at each relative load for each velocity variable and regression model.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Within-subject (empty circle) and between-subject (filled circle) standard deviation (SD) of the mean velocity (upper panels), mean propulsive velocity (middle panels) and peak velocity (lower panels) attained at each percentage of the one-repetition maximum (%1RM) obtained from linear (left panels) and second-order polynomial (right panels) regression models. *, CV ratio between within- and between-subject CVs < 1.1.

More »

Fig 2 Expand