Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Species composition of ticks submitted in Monmouth County, by acquired municipality.

A) 2006–2011, B) 2012–2016.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Distribution of tick submissions by developmental stage and species.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Total annual submissions comprising 3 medically-important tick species, 2006–2016.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Seasonal phenology of 3 medically-important tick species reflected in passive surveillance submissions.

Monmouth County, New Jersey, 2006–2016. Only 2 D. variabilis nymphs were submitted, both during the month of June.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Percentage and rate of tick submissions by human host age classes.

Monmouth County population data obtained from U.S. Census Bureau [35].

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Reported location of attachment on human hosts.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Degree of engorgement (fed vs. flat) of submitted ticks removed from human hosts.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

Differences in host age distribution of flat vs. fed ticks between tick species.

A) Ixodes scapularis, B) Amblyomma americanum.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 5.

Reported location and activity where ticks were acquired.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Borrelia burgdorferi infection rates in flat vs. fed I. scapularis submitted 2006–2016.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 5.

Relationship between number of infected I. scapularis nymphs (NIN) and Monmouth County Lyme disease cases, 2006–2016.

More »

Fig 5 Expand