Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Patient demographic and clinical characteristics (n = 46).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Systolic PAP as a function of cumulative t-PA dose for each patient (light lines).

Mixed-effects regression model (dense line) revealed a significant linear decrease in systolic PAP (β = -0.37 (SE = 0.05), p < 0.001).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Mean systolic pulmonary artery pressure and cumulative t-PA dose at follow-up intervals.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

(A) Changes in severity of right heart strain on echocardiography from baseline to follow-up (p<0.001). (B) Changes in right heart strain on echocardiography stratified by total t-PA dose. (C) Decrease in RV/LV diameter ratio on CT from baseline to follow-up (p<0.001).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Safety outcomes (n = 46).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Comparison of t-PA dose effect on systolic pulmonary artery pressure in prior CDT studies for submassive pulmonary embolism.

* 28 mg t-PA or 2,67,101 International units of urokinase.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison of bleeding complications to prior studies.

More »

Table 4 Expand