Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Illustration of the main principle behind the proposed US texture characterization approach.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Main steps of the general concept of the signal processing algorithm for texture modelling and feature extraction in US images.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Conversion of a matrix by traversing the matrix and its transposed in ZigZag and in spiral.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Example of a CWT decomposition of a thyroid US image when three image patches are taken from different locations of the US image.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

AR spectra for the patches IUS1, IUS2 and IUS3 (in blue, red and black lines respectively) for the four narrowband signals belonging to the ZigZag matrix to signal conversion.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Color-map of the computed features in patches belonging to thyroid and three classes of non-thyroid regions.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 1.

Spectra used in the numerator (NUM) and denominator (DEN) of Eq (3) for computing the 30 energy ratio features.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 7.

Mean and standard deviation of values of ERs features 1 to 15 of thyroid and non-thyroid patches for the 6 subjects of the Dataset 1.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Mean and standard deviation of values of ERs features 16 to 30 of thyroid and non-thyroid patches for the 6 subjects of the Dataset 1.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Example of obtained AR spectral energy ratios when the approach is applied to the full set of patches extracted from the thyroid US Dataset 1.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Examples of thyroid segmentation using the proposed approach and comparison with the ground truth.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of the proposed approach in terms of Dice Coefficient using the Dataset 1 with algorithms compared in [8].

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison of the proposed approach using Dataset 2 with five algorithm results reported in [9].

More »

Table 3 Expand