Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

A comparison between the technical properties and user operation convenience between the three platforms.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of eMAG with EasyMAG or MagNa96.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Bland-Altman analysis of the quantitative results of eMAG versus MagNA PURE 96.

Bland-Altman analysis was performed on all samples for all the viruses examined, to compare the Ct values measured between eMAG and the MagNA PURE 96. The y-axis presents the delta Ct between the two platforms, while the x-axis presents the mean Ct value for both platforms for each sample. 2 SD borders are shown.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Bland-Altman analysis of the quantitative results of eMAG versus easyMAG.

Bland-Altman analysis was performed on all samples for all the viruses examined, to compare the Ct values measured between eMAG and the easyMAG. The y-axis presents the delta Ct between the two platforms, while the x-axis presents the mean Ct value for both platforms for each sample. 2 SD borders are shown.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Limit of detection (LOD) for each respiratory virus in all platforms.

More »

Table 3 Expand