Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Poultry meat color based on the evaluation by the sighted panelists.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Poultry meat smell based on the evaluation by the sighted and blind panelists.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Poultry meat taste based on the evaluation by the sighted and blind panelists.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Poultry meat tenderness based on the evaluation by the sighted and blind panelists.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Poultry meat juiciness based on the evaluation by the sighted and blind panelists.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Poultry meat overall liking based on the evaluation by the sighted and blind panelists.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 1.

Results of multiple regression and analysis of correlations for relationships with poultry meat overall liking (for all types of meat).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 7.

Dendrograms based on cluster analysis using Ward’s method using five examined traits poultry breast meat, ie. smell, taste, tenderness, juiciness and overal liking.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Dendrograms based on cluster analysis using Ward’s method using five examined traits poultry leg meat, ie. smell, taste, tenderness, juiciness and overal liking.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 2.

Results of MANOVA (Wilks’s test) and multi-variate (based on all traits) pairwise comparisons based on F-test for traits of breast meat.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Results of MANOVA (Wilks’s test) and multi-variate (based on all traits) pairwise comparisons based on F-test for traits of leg meat.

More »

Table 3 Expand