Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Location of sites mentioned in the text.

1) Peat Garden North; 2) Phillip’s Garden; 3) Crow Head Cave; 4) Eastern Point; 5) Gargamelle Rockshelter; 6) Lane’s Cove/Englee; 7) Parke’ Beach; 8) Port au Port; 9) Pumbley Cove; 10) Red Indian Lake; 11) Indian Point; 12) North Angle; 13) Big Island; 14) Devil’s Cove; 15) Long Island; 16) High Greco Island; 17) Charles Arm; 18) Swan Island; 19) Comfort Island; 20) Cranberry Island; 21) Rogers Cove; 22) Indian Cove; 23) Boyd’s Cove; 24) Western Indian Island; 25) Ladle Point; 26) Fox Bar; 27) Beaches.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Summary of archaeological contexts of the human skeletal remains analysed in this study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Modelled Dorset and Beothuk radiocarbon dates.

Includes previously published dates from Raghavan et al. 2014 and Duggan et al. 2017.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Calibrated Beothuk dates modelled with a date constraint of AD 1829.

The purple shaded bars specify the parameters used to model the radiocarbon dates. Where the skeletal remains were found with modified European artifacts or trade items, the dates were constrained between AD 1500 and 1829. Includes published radiocarbon dates from Duggan et al. 2017.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The δ13C and δ15N values of Beothuk individuals.

The samples are separated chronologically by the median radiocarbon date of each sample. Includes published data from Duggan et al. 2017 and Kuch et al. 2007.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Results of Dunnett’s T3 post hoc comparison between chronological groups.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 5.

A comparison of the stable isotope values of Dorset and Beothuk adults and subadults.

The naturally mummified subadult, NP 240, is indicated by an arrow. Includes published data from Duggan et al. 2017, Raghavan et al. 2014, and Kuch et al. 2007.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Clusters of archaeological fauna used in the SIAR model.

The modern Newfoundland salmon data are from Dixon et al. 2012, and are corrected for the Suess Effect.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Estimated proportions of terrestrial (C1), pelagic (C2) and benthic (C3) food sources (left), and diagnostic matrix plots (right) for each cultural/chronological group.

Model includes published human collagen isotope data from Raghavan et al. 2014, Duggan et al. 2017, and Kuch et al. 2007.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 3.

Results of the SIAR model, including 95% credibility intervals, mode and median estimates.

More »

Table 3 Expand