Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Athletes’ recovery and stress profile throughout their preparation for the 2016 Olympic Games.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Comparison of athletes’ total stress and total recovery their preparation for the 2016 Olympic Games.

Notes: TS = Total stress; TR = Total recovery; a = 1st time point diference between TS and TR (t = -4.11, SE = 0.46, p<0.01; d = 2.59); b = 2nd time point difference between TS and TR (t = -5.96, SE = 0.38, p<0.01; d = 3.47); c = 3rd time point difference between TS and TR (t = -3.16, SE = 0.44, p = 0.03; d = 2.47); d = 4th time point difference between TS and TR (t = -2.57, SE = 0.47, p = 0.04; d = 1.56).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Athletes’ injury prevalence and characteristics throughout their preparation for the 2016 Olympic Games.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Athletes’ resilience levels at the beginning and the end of an Olympic preparatory year.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Stressors’ characteristics perceived by the athletes during their training for the 2016 Olympic Games.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Psychological factors influencing the resilience process for the Brazilian rhythmic gymnastics athletes.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Hypothetical model of psychological resilience, injury and sport performance in the elite rhythmic gymnastics.

More »

Fig 5 Expand