Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

CONSORT [23] flow chart of participants in the RCT.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Benefits received and welfare rights advice awarded to intervention arm participants (n = 381).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Distribution of benefits received by 24 months among the 335 participants receiving welfare rights advice in the intervention arm.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Baseline demographic data by trial arm.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Baseline data–primary and secondary outcome measures by trial arm.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Primary outcome: CASP-19 scores at baseline, 12 months and 24 months by trial arm using complete cases and multiple imputation (MI).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Secondary outcome measures at 24m by trial arm.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Comparing CASP-19 scores at 24 months between subgroups who did or did not receive welfare rights advice or welfare benefits (Intervention arm only).

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Comparing secondary outcomes between subgroups of those who did or did not receive welfare rights advice or additional benefits (Intervention arm only).

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Cost-utility analysis: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)—base case.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Cost-consequence analysis–balance sheet.

More »

Table 10 Expand