Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Defining QoL in relation to wheelchair use in childhood: A thematic summary and map [17].

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Flow diagram of participants.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Respondent characteristics for children and young people responding to questionnaires and participating in interviews.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Ranking of importance of outcomes from questionnaire survey (n = 21).

Rating from 1 Not important to 5 Extremely Important.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

List of WATCh tool outcome choices and illustrative qualitative quotes.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Interviewees’ retrospective scoring of top outcomes before and after wheelchair provision (n = 8).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Pilot usability data: Outcomes ranked by inclusion in Top 5, satisfaction scored from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied).

More »

Table 4 Expand