Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Venous contour irregularity witnessed in two patients.

A-C show soft tissue distorting the vessel (white arrows). D-F show focal vessel narrowing (black arrows). Tumor (T) and portal vein (*) are marked accordingly. All images taken from 3mm multiplanar reformation in the axial (A/D), coronal (B/E) and saggital (C/F) planes.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Distribution of tumor grading and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens is shown for the patient cohorts with/ without venous contour irregularity.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Distribution of tumor grading and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens is shown for the patient cohorts with tumor to vein contact ≤180°/>180°.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Flowchart showing distribution of patients in groups with and without venous contour irregularity (a) and patients in groups with tumor to vein contact >180° or ≤180° (b) as well as results of histopathological examination.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients with venous contour irregularity and without venous contour irregularity (a). Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients with tumor to vein contact ≤180° and >180° (b).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the signs of venous contour irregularity and contact to vein >180° as well as the combined analysis.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients with both venous contour irregularity and contact to vein>180° and without either venous contour irregularity or contact to vein.

More »

Fig 4 Expand