Table 1.
Categories and objectives of main modelling techniques.
Table 2.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria for peer-reviewed studies included in this review.
Fig 1.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Flow Diagram.
R (reason) 1: UK FMD 2001 epidemic models; R2: Japan 2010 FMD epidemic models; R3: Other simulated epidemic models.
Fig 2.
Frequency of type of models among the studies included in this review.
Fig 3.
Schematic representation of an epidemic model (Source: Adapted from Kostova et al., [122]).
Table 3.
Main risk factors identified through selected modelling studies and presented in this review (sorted by decreasing order of occurrence).
Table 4.
FMD risk factors studies reporting use of logistic regression model.