Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Prevalence of pain due to haemophilia among study participants (N = 104).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of study participants (Baseline, N = 82a).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Pain characteristics of study participants (reporting to the previous year, Baseline, N = 82a).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Descriptive statistics and Cronbach’s alpha of the pain intensity and interference items (Baseline, N = 82).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Strategies for pain management and perception of relief (Baseline, N = 82).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Pain management specialists who participants consulted or wished to consult to deal with haemophilia-related pain (Baseline, N = 82).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Satisfaction with current pain treatment by health care professionals (Baseline, N = 82).

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Obliquely rotated factor loadings of principal axis factoring for the 13 items assessing pain intensity and interference.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 1.

Standardized values of the confirmatory factor analysis for interference.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 9.

Fit indices for CFA model.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Results of Pearson correlation tests for inter-item and item-total correlations of pain intensity.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Results of Pearson correlation tests for inter-item and item-total correlations of pain interference.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

Convergent validity between MHPQ dimensions and validating measures.

More »

Table 12 Expand