Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

General characteristics of study participants (n = 121).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Internal consistency and reliability measures of the FAB-E scores among PD patients (n = 67).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Concurrent validity using Spearman correlations between the performance on the FAB-E and the other neuropsychological tests among Parkinson’ disease patients (n = 67).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison of the performance of the FAB-E scores between control group and Parkinson’s disease patients (n = 121).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Comparison of the performance of the FAB-E scores between Parkinson’s disease patients with and without cognitive impairment, and with and without dementia (n = 67).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 1.

Discriminant power of the FAB-E among healthy subjects and Parkinson’s disease patients.

Abbreviations: Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; AUC, area under the curve.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Discriminant power of the FAB-E among Parkinson’s disease patients with (MMSE<26) and without (MMSE≥26) cognitive impairment.

Abbreviations: Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; AUC, area under the curve.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Discriminant power of the FAB-E among Parkinson’s disease patients with (MMSE<24) and without (MMSE≥24) dementia.

Abbreviations: Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; AUC, area under the curve.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 6.

Subgroup analysis of the discriminant power of the FAB-E to detect executive dysfunction between healthy controls and PD patients and between PD patients with (PD-CI) and without cognitive deficits (PD-nonCI) by sociodemographic characteristics.

More »

Table 6 Expand