Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Clustering of 147 hybrid parents into 8 groups using SSRs, and selection of representative 17 parents from different marker based groups (as shown by arrow mark).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Frequency distribution of genetic distances of all the 147 hybrid parents and for the selected representative set of 17 parents using SSRs.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Clustering pattern of selected representative set of 17 hybrid parents using SSRs from the 8 marker based groups (mentioned from G1 to G8).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Genetic distance and allelic variation of all the hybrid parents and for the selected representative set of parents using SSRs.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

AMOVA for B- and R-line groups.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Distribution of (a) grain yield (kg ha-1), (b) general and specific combining ability and (c) mid and better parent heterosis, over 136 hybrids.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Analysis of variance of hybrids vis a vis their parents for grain yield in rainy-2015 at two locations (Hisar and Patancheru).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Combined analysis of variance for grain yield of hybrids from eight marker based groups in pearl millet.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Association between SSR based genetic distance and hybrids performance, heterosis and combining ability for grain yield.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Marker based group wise summary of genetic distance, grain yield, better parent heterosis, mid parent heterosis and specific combining ability for grain yield across the locations.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 5.

Heterotic pools in the hybrid parents of pearl millet.

More »

Fig 5 Expand