Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Adaptive noise filter concept.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Block diagram of the proposed motion artefact reduction algorithm.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Hampel filter based estimation.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

List of the symbols used.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Hampel filter-based estimation.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Conceptual structure of hampel filter-based filtering.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 2.

MHEALTH datasets.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 6.

The correlation between the acceleration signals and the ECG signal at different lags.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

The correlation between the ECG signal and the acceleration signal.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Filtering results using the ECG signal recorded during walking.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Filtering results using the ECG signal recorded during running.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 3.

Performance statistics of the adaptive filtering algorithms at different activity levels.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 10.

Filtering results using the ECG signal recorded during free movement.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Filtering results using the ECG signal recorded during knee bending exercise.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Example of treatment of heavey contaminated ECG signal.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Filtering results using the ECG signal recorded during walking following by jogging exercise.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Table 4.

Percentage of the removed motion artefact from the raw signal.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Performance statistics of the tested algorithms at different activity levels.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Statistical results of the filtering performance in terms of R-beak detection.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 14.

Summary of the performance during different forms of exercise.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

The QRS complex detection accuracy before and after the filtering using the proposed methods.

More »

Fig 15 Expand