Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Eigenvalues and percentage of variance explained for the 5-factor solution (Stage 2).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Age distribution for Study 3 sample.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

CFA Path diagram for Model 2 of the TEAQ-37 Rus.

Rectangles indicate measured variables and large ellipses represent TEAQ-37 Rus subscales. Covariances of errors between items with similar content are shown.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

CFA fit indices of assessed models (Stage 3).

CMIN/DF—Relative chi-square; CFI -comparative fix index; NNFI (TLI)—non-normed fit index; RMSEA—root mean square error of approximation.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

TEAQ-37 Rus factor structure.

Factor loading of each item are shown. (R) after item numbers denotes reverse scored items. At the bottom of the table Cronbach's α and percentage variance explained by each factor are given.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

TEAQ-37 Rus subscale data.

Mean and standard deviations are provided for subscale score sums, and correlation coefficient values are given for correlations between the subscales.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Demographic group data for Study 4.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Correlations of the TEAQ-37 Rus subscales with the Big Five personality factors (r values).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Correlations of the TEAQ-37 Rus subscales with the EmIn subscales (r values).

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 3.

Perceived pleasantness ratings of touch videos for participants with low and high total TEAQ-37 Rus scores.

Stars indicate significance levels in post hoc tests (*: p < .05, **: p < .01, ***: p < .001).

More »

Fig 3 Expand