Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Selection of the study population.

This study enrolled 5625 patients. We excluded 269patients who died in hospital, 784 patients with missing patient characteristics, and patients without death information. Finally, we analyzed 4572 patients including 1623 (35.5%) dead and 2949 (64.5%) alive.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics for baseline variables.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis using variables included in the MAGGIC score.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Risk score according to death.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Observed vs.Model-predicted 1-year mortality in risk groups: Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test for risk score mortality indicated a good calibration (p = 0.5559), the predicted mortality rates corresponded with the observed mortality rates in each decile.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

Net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) for specific models using the BNP.

More »

Table 4 Expand