Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

A–F. OCT-A images. Representative OCT-A images of the different devices of the SCP (A–C) and DCP (D–F). A+D = Optovue, B+E = Canon, C+F = Heidelberg.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Interobserver (R1 vs. R2) intrasession reproducibility of foveal avascular zone area measurements (m1, m2, m3) of the superficial and deep OCT angiogram for the three different devices.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Pairwise comparison as paired t-test between the first and second (m1 vs. m2) and the first and third measurement (m1 vs. m3) and ICC values for the three different devices (R1, SCP).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Pairwise differences and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of FAZ measurements comparing the three different devices (R1, SCP, MD = mean difference, AD = absolute difference).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Regression analysis.

Regression line showing the linear relationship between the area of the FAZ measured using the Optovue device and the Canon (blue) / Heidelberg (green) devices.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

A–C. Bland-Altman-analysis. Bland-Altman plots showing the level of agreement for the area of the FAZ in the superficial retinal OCT-A angiogram. A: Optovue and Canon; B: Optovue and Heidelberg; C: Heidelberg and Canon. Broken line represents the mean difference; dotted lines represent the limits of agreement.

More »

Fig 3 Expand