Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Schematic of the study selection.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of included studies.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Risk of bias graph: A review of the authors’ judgments about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Summary of risk of bias: A review of the authors’ judgments about each risk of bias item in each included study.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Combined results of EPDS and BDI scores comparing CBT vs. control conditions immediately post-intervention: A random effects analysis.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Combined results of EPDS and BDI scores comparing CBT vs. control conditions at long-term post-intervention: A random effects analysis.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Forest plot of DASS and BAI scores comparing CBT vs. control conditions post-intervention: A random effects analysis.

A, DASS-stress; B, DASS-anxiety; C, BAI -anxiety.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Meta-analysis of the OR in women who improved and failed to meet the diagnostic criteria (variously defined) comparing CBT with control post-intervention: A random effects analysis.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Funnel plots for evaluating the publication bias.

More »

Fig 8 Expand